The short answer

Most services pages fail on the same few points: a headline that names the company instead of the buyer's problem, no clear scope, proof that is vague or missing, silence on price, and a generic "Contact us" as the only next step. Fix those five first. Everything else on this list improves a page that already answers the basics.

Why services pages deserve the attention

For a B2B company that sells a service, the service and solution pages are where a researching buyer decides whether to get in touch. Buyers now do most of that deciding before they speak to anyone. In 6sense's 2024 Buyer Experience Report, B2B buyers were nearly 70% through their purchasing process before engaging with sellers, initiated first contact more than 80% of the time, and 81% already had a preferred vendor when they did1. The same report put the average buying group at 11 people1. Your services page has to make the case to all of them while you are not in the room.

It also has to make that case quickly. Jakob Nielsen's analysis of Microsoft Research data on more than 2 billion page visits found that the first 10 seconds decide whether people stay, and advised communicating the value proposition within that time2. That is the test the first section of the checklist applies.

How to use the checklist

  1. Pick one page. Choose the service page with the most search impressions or visits that is closest to revenue. Google Search Console's Performance report, filtered by page, shows which pages people actually find.
  2. Score every check as pass, partial or fail. Be strict: "partial" means a buyer would still need to ask.
  3. Read it on a phone first. Many buyers will meet the page there, and problems with length, layout and buttons show up faster on a small screen.
  4. Fix failures from the top of the list down, because a visitor who leaves at the first screen never reaches your case studies.
  5. Note the date of every change, so you can measure it (see the last section).

1. The first screen

2. Fit: who it is for, and who it is not

3. Scope: what you actually do

4. Proof

5. Price and commercial terms

6. Every member of the buying group

With buying groups of around 11 people1, the person who finds your page is rarely the only one who reads it. Give each common role what it needs, in a section or a linked page:

7. The next step

8. Search and AI answers

9. Mobile, speed and accessibility

10. Measurement

Most services pages have too little traffic for a conventional A/B test. Our guide to CRO for low-traffic B2B websites explains what to do instead, and how to measure the impact of a website change covers the before-and-after method in detail.

A scoring sheet you can copy

AreaChecksWhy it comes in this order
1. First screen5Decides whether the rest is read
2. Fit4Tells the buyer the page is about them
3. Scope5Answers "what do I actually get"
4. Proof5Answers "why should I believe you"
5. Price and terms4A question almost every buyer has
6. Buying group4Gets the page past the other readers
7. Next step5Turns intent into a conversation
8. Search and AI answers5Brings the right visitors to the page
9. Mobile, speed, accessibility4Removes avoidable friction
10. Measurement3Shows whether any of it worked

Score 2 for a pass, 1 for partial and 0 for a fail, out of 88. The total is useful for comparing your own pages with each other over time; it is not a benchmark against other companies.

A worked example

This example is illustrative, not a client. A consultancy's cyber security page opens with "Securing tomorrow, today" over a stock photograph, a carousel of three messages and a "Contact us" button. Scored against the checklist, the first screen fails four of five checks, and the call to action is only a partial pass.

A rewrite based on the checklist might read: "Cyber Essentials Plus certification for UK firms of 10 to 250 people", followed by "We prepare you for the assessment, fix what fails and stay with you until you pass. Fixed price from the first call." The call to action becomes "Book a 20-minute readiness check", next to the consultancy's own certification. Further down, the page adds a five-step process, what the client must provide, a price range, a short section for whoever signs the contract, and one relevant case study.

None of that guarantees more enquiries. It does mean a buyer can decide whether to call without having to call first, which is the job of the page.

Common mistakes

For the wider process of finding and prioritising changes, see our B2B CRO guide.

Where Artiweave fits

Artiweave reviews the pages you already have, including services and solution pages, against evidence from crawls, Search Console and performance data, and proposes specific changes, such as a clearer H1 or a rewritten title tag. Your team approves, edits or rejects each one; approved changes are published with automatic rollback, and outcomes are reported with the strength of the evidence, including "inconclusive". It is in private beta.

Frequently asked questions

How long should a B2B services page be?

As long as it takes to answer the questions a buyer would otherwise ask on a sales call, and no longer. For most services that means a clear first screen, then sections on fit, scope, process, proof, price and the next step. Length matters less than whether each section answers a real question.

Should a services page show prices?

Show as much as you honestly can. A fixed price or a starting price is most useful; if neither is possible, explain what drives the cost and give typical ranges or engagement models. A page that says nothing about price leaves a question almost every buyer has unanswered.

One page for all services, or one page per service?

One page per distinct service that buyers search for and buy separately, with a short overview page linking to them. A single page covering everything cannot match each search, and it cannot answer each service's questions in enough depth.

How do I know whether a change to a services page worked?

Record a baseline before the change, change one thing at a time, and compare equal periods afterwards against similar pages you did not change. On low-traffic pages many results will be inconclusive, and they should be reported that way.

Sources

  1. 6sense: 2024 Buyer Experience Report, press release (9 October 2024), as republished by Silicon UK
  2. Nielsen Norman Group: How Long Do Users Stay on Web Pages? (Jakob Nielsen, September 2011), drawing on Liu, White and Dumais, Microsoft Research, SIGIR 2010
  3. Google Search Central: Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content
  4. W3C: Understanding WCAG 2.2 Success Criterion 2.5.8, Target Size (Minimum)

Improve the services pages you already have, one approved change at a time.

Artiweave proposes specific changes from evidence, your team decides what is published, and every outcome is measured honestly. It is in private beta.

Join the waitlist